Paying for bridge repairs
October 3rd 2007 01:05 pm
By now, you’ve probably heard that it will cost $13.6 Billion dollars to bring New Jersey’s deficient and obsolete bridges up to current standards. OK, that’s fine. After all, no one wants the Pulaski Skyway to collapse. But it seems the state government is deliberately pushing aside the simplest way to pay for the work, and instead is touting Governor Corzine’s super-secret asset monetization plan.
In remarks to reporters after he released the report, Corzine offered no new insight into his long-awaited plan to use the state’s toll roads to raise billions of dollars to pay down state debt and make infrastructure improvements. However, he said, the enormous bridge repairs alone prove the need for his so-called “asset monetization” plan…
[State Transportation Commissioner] Kolluri said the state now spends $509 million a year on bridges maintained by the DOT and by the county and local governments.
To “substantially reduce” the number of structurally deficient and functionally obsolete state-owned bridges, spending would have to be increased to $800 million a year, Kolluri said.
He acknowledged in a letter to Corzine submitted with the bridge report that that figure is “staggering and perhaps unattainable.” So he recommended increasing spending by $150 million a year, to $659 million, and focusing on the structurally deficient bridges rather than the functionally obsolete ones.
Corzine said his administration would consider raising the tax that motorists pay when they buy gasoline to pay for bridges and other transportation needs, but he doesn’t consider it the “optimal response for how we get resources.”
“There are other alternatives,” he said. “What we have to do is find the alternative that takes us farthest down the road to solving all of our problems.”
So an extra $300 million per year is “staggering and perhaps unattainable,” but the super-secret asset monetization plan will provide only $150 million per year. And that means we can only repair bridges that are ready to fall down, and not improve the obsolete bridges.
Does this make sense to you? Is an extra $300 million really unattainable? Let’s take a look at the gas tax:
According to the New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, each 1 cent/gallon increase in the motor fuel tax brings in an additional $52.7 million per year. That means a 6 cent per gallon tax increase will bring in an extra $316 million per year. More than enough to repair the bridges, according to the transportation commissioner.
At current gasoline prices, that’s only a 2.4% increase in the price of gas. Certainly reasonable considering that the motor fuels tax hasn’t been raised since 1988, and New Jersey’s fuel tax rate is the third-lowest in the nation. A 6 cent/gallon increase would still place NJ’s rate well below the nation’s average.
So why do we have to wait for Corzine’s super-secret asset monetization plan, when a small, long-overdue motor fuel tax increase will get us more bang for the buck? I suspect the answer to that is: Follow the money.
How should we pay for repairing our bridges?
- Increase the gas tax: 29 (62%)
- Increase Turnpike/Parkway tolls: 18 (38%)
- Borrow more and go deeper into debt: 0 (0%)
- Corzine’s super-secret plan will save us all: 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 47
alewifebp responded on 03 Oct 2007 at 4:48 pm #
I really only support the raise in gas taxes/tolls if we also get some extra money for mass transit improvement as well. I feel many at NJ-ARP and those who read this blog feel the same way. While our bridges could certainly use a little bit of spit shine (OK, a LOT of spit shine), supporting initiatives that actually get cars and trucks off the road is also a very relevant goal.
Bob Scheurle responded on 04 Oct 2007 at 8:51 am #
An editorial from the Express-Times of Easton, PA:
And an editorial from the Bergen Record:
Joe Versaggi responded on 04 Oct 2007 at 10:57 am #
The fundamental problem remains with raising either sort of user fee (gas tax, toll), which is this and most state DOT’s would rather build new roads and bridges than repair old ones. They still think it is 1965 and can build their way out of congestion, lip service to the contrary notwithstanding.
It will take an I-35W style bridge collapse here before they get serious is done, asset monetization or otherwise. Until then, just stay off the Pulaski Skyway and for that matter The Tappan Zee.