![]() |
May 11, 2002 |
Modern Electric Multiple Units and Fleet Rehabilitation
NOTE: The New Jersey Association of Railroad Passengers (NJ-ARP) has discussed this proposal with New Jersey Transit. NJ-ARP can appreciate the rationale for bi-level equipment, the political realities involved and the commitment of monies already made. However, we still believe our proposal is in the best interests of both the rail rider and the State of New Jersey. We encourage NJT to minimize its order of bi-levels and redirect the funds to the purchase of modern electric multiple units. Contents: Executive SummaryThe New Jersey Association of Railroad Passengers (NJ-ARP) urges New Jersey Transit (NJT) to reconsider its proposed $692.5 million acquisition of 277 bi-level passenger cars, and instead examine a $432.1 million alternative which could save the corporation $260.4 million. NJT has indicated its willingness expand passenger capacity by procuring 231 bi-level cars for systemwide use comprising 33,495 seats for $577.5 million as well as purchasing an additional 46 such cars for the "Clocker" service incorporating 6,670 seats for $115 million. NJ-ARP recommends an alternative $405.1 million expenditure for systemwide use accommodating 33,543 seats and a supplemental $27 million buy for the "Clocker" service adding 2,656 seats. We believe the acquisition of 150 individually powered, self-propelled, electric multiple-unit (EMU) passenger cars, the rehabilitation of 102 Comet 1 and 1B cars, the purchase of 32 MTA West-of-Hudson cars, as well as the securing of 36 Amtrak Horizon cars for "Clocker" service trains would be a more effective use of scarce capital funds, enhance rolling stock utilization, and minimize equipment operating costs. Despite the contribution of Port Authority of New York & New Jersey funds toward the proposed capacity expansion, NJ-ARP believes EMUs should be purchased rather than the proposed bi-level equipment. NJ-ARP believes this action would be in the best interests of both the riding public and the state's taxpayers given the severe financial crisis affecting both the state and NJT. Our conclusions are based on the cost and passenger capacity of the respective cars, the improvement in travel times, flexible service patterns and increased operational efficiencies. NJT & NJ-ARP ProposalsThe NJT Proposal:
Total is $692.5 million for 40,165 seats or $17,241 per seat. The NJ-ARP Proposal:
Total is $432.1 million for 36,199 seats or $11,937 per seat. Comparison of the NJ-ARP and NJT Proposals:
Criteria for the NJ-ARP Proposal:
Rationale for Equipment Proposal:While the goal of increasing per car capacity is laudable, NJ-ARP believes bi-level cars are not the most efficient use of scarce NJT capital resources. We believe each bi-level car will:
Despite an assumed 25% higher adhesion factor, the new ALP46 locomotives will simply make the currently unacceptable ALP44 performance with 8 or 9 Comet cars only marginally acceptable. Train performance will deteriorate even further when an ALP46 is assigned to haul the 9 bi-level and one (1) single level Comet 5 cab car consist or a 12 single level car formation. NJ-ARP's field observations reveal that a 150 ton, 3,000 horsepower, LIRR DE/DM diesel locomotive experiences difficulties when required to pull more than 6 bi-level cars, particularly on the Port Jefferson branch, where the topography is similar to the M&E. We are concerned that the ALP46 locomotive capability will be similarly limited. Return the M&E to EMU OperationIn order to fully utilize the untapped capacity of the Hudson River tunnels and the platform lengths of New York Penn Station, NJ-ARP proposes the reinstatement of en-route splitting and merging of EMU train consists on the M&E lines, which was the case prior to its 1984 re-electrification. Reviving split/merge operations at Summit, and creating a new one at Newark Broad Street, create additional track and platform capacity. Critical to such operations is the adoption of automatic couplers, which are in routine use worldwide and in climates more extreme than New Jersey's. For example, this split/merge type of operation with such couplers is in constant use by the Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District's South Shore service. Midtown Direct trains could accomplish a split/merge at Summit and Newark Broad Street directing 9-to-15 car consists to/from Manhattan and still be accommodated in western terminal yards. EMUs would also speed service by 8-to-12 minutes per trip increasing NJT's equipment utilization rate. From its inception, the twin challenges of hilly topography and frequent curves characterized M&E operations. This resulted in the exclusive use of EMUs when the line was electrified in 1931. But, with the initiation of Midtown Direct service in 1996, NJT decided to use electric locomotives with Comet cars. The ALP44 locomotives, while having very high horsepower, have demonstrated inadequate tractive effort to haul more than 7 cars on already padded schedules. In addition, their unreliability has led to en-route delays or outright cancellation of trains. Thus, today's 9-car consists coupled with adverse weather conditions demonstrate that the ALP44 is insufficient to accommodate increased passenger loadings. The M&E has frequent stops on most trains with heavy peak hour ridership, often with many standees. Because of the ALP44's limitations, running times now are the longest since the 1920's, prior to the DL&W's electrification. NJ-ARP notes that most electrically powered suburban train operations in the U.S. and Canada (excluding the small MARC Penn Line and several SEPTA rush hour consists), including the FRA-regulated Staten Island Railway and PATH, make exclusive use of EMUs. Only NJT is "out-of-step" using locomotives that were designed to pull 7-car Amtrak trains to Washington in 3 hours, not haul regional passenger ("commuter") trains with frequent starts and stops. We realize the FRA treats each EMU as a locomotive for inspection purposes. However, we believe this issue has been over emphasized and allowed to crowd out all other considerations in equipment choices: better scheduled on-time performance, quicker trip times, split and merge capabilities, and ease of passenger ingress and egress. One further note on EMUs. NJT's failure to adapt its "Arrow" trainsets to operate on both the Newark and Hoboken Divisions without a time consuming transformer adjustment in the Meadows maintenance facility has inhibited rapid deployment of this rolling stock cars when emergencies arise. Midtown Direct Operation ProposalAssuming the re-equipping of M&E services with high performance EMU equipment and the establishment of split/merge procedures at Summit and Newark Broad Street, then operational enhancements become feasible and additional track capacity and slot space is created on the NEC and in NYP. With additional Hudson River tunnels years into the future, the correct selection of new equipment can allow for higher passenger boardings. Track slots cost money and these expenses should be factored into the equation when considering rolling stock acquisitions. The following is our proposal:
ConclusionWe believe that the proposal presented above affords NJT with a unique opportunity to conserve scarce capital funds and increase capacity more quickly than by purchasing bi-level cars. The savings incurred from our proposal could then be deployed to extending the third rail from New York Penn Station to Secaucus Transfer, allowing out-of-use LIRR trains to transport Bergen/Main/Pascack Line passengers on dedicated trains to Manhattan. We stand ready to meet with NJT representatives to discuss our proposal in more detail.
|